<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Denial is More than Just a River in Egypt: in this case, it&#8217;s incisive!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elasticbrands.com/blog/2009/04/denial-is-more-than-just-a-river-in-egypt-in-this-case-its-incisive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elasticbrands.com/blog/2009/04/denial-is-more-than-just-a-river-in-egypt-in-this-case-its-incisive/</link>
	<description>Marketing Advisory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:43:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Dempsey</title>
		<link>http://www.elasticbrands.com/blog/2009/04/denial-is-more-than-just-a-river-in-egypt-in-this-case-its-incisive/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Dempsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elasticbrands.com/blog/?p=455#comment-838</guid>
		<description>True dat.  Thanks Dave -- great comments.  Inspired another post for later today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True dat.  Thanks Dave &#8212; great comments.  Inspired another post for later today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Andrzejek</title>
		<link>http://www.elasticbrands.com/blog/2009/04/denial-is-more-than-just-a-river-in-egypt-in-this-case-its-incisive/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>David Andrzejek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elasticbrands.com/blog/?p=455#comment-837</guid>
		<description>Hi Tim.
A slight tangent to your post, but I had my own &#039;ah-ha&#039; moment on new and social media and the struggles &#039;old&#039; media are facing.  I read this economist piece (http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13446620 ) and thought &quot;but isn&#039;t that how TV and many papers work already???&quot;  It&#039;s always been a 2-sided business model with one side (advertisers) carrying most/all the cost for the other side (subscribers).  

Then I read this piece in WSJ (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123958338833312319.html ) and realized that media has been evolving for decades, and the internet is only the latest accelerant.   
best,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tim.<br />
A slight tangent to your post, but I had my own &#8216;ah-ha&#8217; moment on new and social media and the struggles &#8216;old&#8217; media are facing.  I read this economist piece (<a href="http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13446620" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13446620</a> ) and thought &#8220;but isn&#8217;t that how TV and many papers work already???&#8221;  It&#8217;s always been a 2-sided business model with one side (advertisers) carrying most/all the cost for the other side (subscribers).  </p>
<p>Then I read this piece in WSJ (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123958338833312319.html" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123958338833312319.html</a> ) and realized that media has been evolving for decades, and the internet is only the latest accelerant.<br />
best,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
